|
課程名稱 |
貧窮與社會救助
Poverty and Social Assistance |
|
開課學期 |
110-2 |
|
授課對象 |
學程 人口學程 |
|
授課教師 |
傅從喜 |
|
課號 |
SW7005 |
|
課程識別碼 |
330 M1610 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
社112 |
|
備註 |
人口學程選修領域(三)保險與福利。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：3人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1102SW7005_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
貧窮是國家最早介入的社會福利領域，可追溯至16世紀。幾百年來僅管經濟發展已不可同日而語，但貧窮問題仍在，因其界定已更為多元，各國介入貧窮的策略與作法也相當不同。
本課程涵蓋教師講授、文獻閱讀與實務觀訪三個部分，期讓同學透過閱讀、討論與實務接觸，深入掌握貧窮與社會救助議題。 |
|
課程目標 |
1.瞭解貧窮的肇因、概念與界定
2.瞭解社會救助體系的概念與制度運作
3.瞭解現行社會救助的挑戰與困境
|
|
課程要求 |
1.每人閱讀2本碩博士論文，並做書面摘要(2頁以內)與口頭報告。
2.每人閱讀中文期刊論文2篇
3.每人閱讀英文齊開論文3篇
4.每人完成實務觀訪報告一份 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
福利體制與救助制度的形成:
1. Ferrarini, T., et al., 2016. Social transfers and poverty in middle- and high-income countries – A global perspective. Global Social Policy 2016, Vol. 16(1) 22–46.
2. Laenen, T. 2017. Do institutions matter? The interplay
3. between income benefit design, popular perceptions, and the social legitimacy of targeted welfare. Journal of European Social Policy 2018, Vol. 28(1) 4–17.
4. Lahat, L., 2018. The Effects of Knowledge about Poverty, Exposure to Poverty and Trust on Policymakers’ Perceptions about Poverty. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 52(3): 611-630.
貧窮的肇因:
1. HICK, D. AND A. LANAU, 2018. Moving In and Out of In-work Poverty in the UK: An Analysis of Transitions, Trajectories and Trigger Events. Journal of Social Policy, 47(4): 661-682.
2. Polin, V. and Raitano, M. (2014), ‘Poverty transitions and trigger events across EU groups and countries: Evidence from EU-SILC’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 4, pp.745–772.
3. MacDonald, R.; Shildrick, T.; Furlong, A. (2014). In search of intergenerational cultures of worklessness: Hunting the yeti and shooting zombies. Critical Social Policy, 34(2), 199-220.
貧窮的生活與影響:
1. Tracy Shildrick and Robert MacDonald, 2013. Poverty talk: how people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’. The Sociological Review, Vol. 61, 285–303.
2. Kathy Hamilton, 2012. Low-income Families and Coping through Brands: Inclusion or Stigma? Sociology 46(1) 74–90.
3. Green, J., et al., 2017. A model of how targeted and universal welfare entitlements impact
4. on material, psycho-social and structural determinants of health in older adults. Social Science & Medicine, 187: 20-28.
貧窮的測量:
1. Hick, R. (2015), ‘Three perspectives on the mismatch between measures of material poverty’, British Journal of Sociology, 66, 1, pp.163–172.
2. Notten, G., 2015. How Poverty Indicators Confound Poverty Reduction Evaluations: The Targeting Performance of Income Transfers in Europe. Soc Indic Res, 127:1039–1056.
3. Therese Saltkjel and Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, 2017. Welfare Generosity in Europe: A Multi-level Study of Material Deprivation and Income Poverty among Disadvantaged Groups. SOCIAL POLICY & DMINISTRATION, VOL. 51, NO. 7, 1287–1310.
社會排除:
1. Nolan, B. and C. T. Whelan, 2018. Poverty and social exclusion indicators in the European Union. In Reducing inequalities, Ch 7.
2. Fahmy, E., et al., 2018. Understanding social exclusion: the views of the UK public. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, vol 26, no 3, 439–58.
3. Regenmortel, S. V., et al., 2016. Social Exclusion in Later Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Population Ageing, 9:315–344.
貧窮循環與底層階級:
1. Papanastastiou, S. and C. Papanastastiou,2019. Causal dynamics of poverty reproduction in EU countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 28: 117-127.
2. MacDonald, R., et al., 2020. ‘Cycles of disadvantage’ revisited: young people, families and poverty across generations, Journal of Youth Studies, 23:1, 12-27.
3. Bond-Taylor, S. 2015. Dimensions of Family Empowerment in Work with So-Called ‘Troubled’ Families. Social Policy and Society, 14(3): 371-384.
4. MacDonald, R.; Shildrick, T.; Furlong, A. (2014). In search of intergenerational cultures of worklessness: Hunting the yeti and shooting zombies. Critical Social Policy, 34(2), 199-220.
5. Paolo Barbieri and Rossella Bozzon, 2016. Welfare, labour market deregulation and households’ poverty risks: An analysis of the risk of entering poverty at childbirth in different European welfare clusters. Journal of European Social Policy, 2016, Vol. 26(2) 99–123.
資產調查與行政的爭議:
1. Susana Vilhena (2020): Is it because you can’t, or don’t want to? The implementation of frontline sanctions in Norwegian social assistance, European Journal of Social Work.
2. Chareyron, S., et al., 2018. Raising Take-Up of Social Assistance Benefits through a Simple Mailing: Evidence from a French Field Experiment.
性別與兒少:
1.Nieuwenhuis, R. and L. C. Maldonado, 2018. THE TRIPLE BIND OF SINGLE‑PARENT FAMILIES Resources, mployment and policies to improve wellbeing. (book)
2.Hakovitta, M., et al., 2020. Child Poverty, Child Maintenance and Interactions with Social Assistance Benefits Among Lone Parent Families: a Comparative Analysis. Journal of Social Policy, 49(1): 19-39.
3.Rot6hwell, D. W. and A. McEwen, 2017. Comparing Child Poverty Risk by Family Structure During the 2008 Recession. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79: 1224-1240.
4.BA´ RCENA-MARTI´N, E., et al., 2018. Social Transfers and Child Poverty in European Countries: Pro-poor Targeting or Pro-child Targeting? Journal of Social Policy, 47(4): 739-758.
貧窮與就業:
1. Haller¨od, B., Ekbrand, H. and Bengtsson, M. (2015), ‘In-work poverty and labour market trajectories: Poverty risks among the working population in 22 European countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, pp.1–17.
2. Girardi, S., et al., 2019. Activated and included? The social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries engaged in “public works”. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 39(9/10): 738-751.
3. Ravn, R. and K. Nielsen, 2019. Employment effects of investments in public employment services for isadvantaged social assistance recipients. European Journal of Social Security, 21(1): 42–62.
遊民議題:
1. Sarah Johnsen, Suzanne Fitzpatrick and Beth Watts, 2018. Homelessness and social control: a typology. HOUSING STUDIES, 2018 VOL. 33, NO. 7, 1106–1126.
2. Chamberlain, C. and G. Johnson, 2011. Journal of Sociology, Volume 49(1): 60–77.
3. Sylvain Chareyron and Patrick Domingues, 2018. TAKE-UP OF SOCIAL ASSISTANCE BENEFITS: THE CASE OF THE FRENCH HOMELESS. Review of Income and Wealth, 64(1): 170-191.
社會救助的影響:
1. Danziger, S. K. (2010). The decline of case welfare and implications for social policy and poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 523–545.
2. Griffiths, R. 2017. No Love on the Dole: The Influence of the UK Means-tested Welfare System on Partnering and family Structure. Journal of Social Policy, 46(3): 543-561.
3. Shahidi, F. V., 2019. The impact of social assistance programs on population health: a systematic review of research in high-income countries. Public Health, 19(2).
救助改革的評估:
1. Minas, R., V. Jakobsen, T. Kauppinen, T. Korpi and T. Lorentzen, 2018. The governance of poverty: Welfare reform, activation policies, and social assistance benefits and caseloads in Nordic countries. Journal of European Social Policy 2018, Vol. 28(5) 487–500.
2. Shaefer, H. L. et al., 2020. The Decline of Cash Assistance and the Well-Being of Poor Households with Children. Social Forces 98(3) 1000–1025,
移民:
1. Sarah Carpentier, Karel Neels, and Karel Van den Bosch, 2017. Exit from and re-entry into social assistance benefit in Belgium among people with migration background and the native-born. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26: 366-383.
2. Eugster, B., 2018. Immigrants and poverty, and conditionality of immigrants’ social rights. Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 28(5) 452–470.
|
|
參考書目 |
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
書面摘要與報告 |
60% |
|
2. |
課堂參與 |
40% |
|
|
|